What to Look for in a Copilot Training Provider

Most organisations rolling out Microsoft 365 Copilot reach the same decision early on. The licences are in place, and the question becomes how to get people using Copilot well. Training providers are easy to find, and most of their course outlines look alike on paper, so the differences only show once the session is under way.

The Copilot training providers worth shortlisting have four things in common. A practising AI consultant runs the session, the content is current, the curriculum builds habits, and support continues after the session. This guide covers each one, then turns them into a Copilot training brief you can use to agree the scope internally and compare providers side by side.

Decide what success looks like

The first temptation is to list the repetitive tasks in each team and train people to hand each one to Copilot. It produces quick wins, and those wins tend to stay confined to the tasks on the list.

The broader outcome is habit. Teach people to fish, and they reach for Copilot whenever a piece of work comes up, without a checklist prompting them.

That changes what you measure. Most organisations track daily active users, which only confirms that someone opened Copilot once that day. In the deployments we have seen, an information worker who has formed the habit uses Copilot around once every ten minutes across the working day. A curriculum aimed at that bar looks different from one aimed at a daily login.

From licensed to habit: Copilot use per information worker, per working day
  • HabitAbout every ten minutes
    About 45 usesThe goal of training
  • RegularA few times a day
    A few uses
  • Daily activeOnce a day
    1 useWhat most dashboards count as adopted
  • LicensedNot yet using
    No use yet

About 45 uses assumes roughly 7.5 working hours at one use every ten minutes.

Teaching someone a list of features has limited reach. People who learn the underlying patterns start recognising, in their own day, the work Copilot handles well.

Who delivers the training

Participants' questions rarely follow a script, and the trainer's own depth with AI decides how well those questions get answered. Ask who will deliver the session: a practising AI consultant who builds with these tools, or a trainer who covers many subjects.

Most of a workshop's value sits in the answers participants get to their own questions. A trainer who can answer on the spot, in the context of each person's role, is where the budget goes furthest.

Many providers can adapt their Copilot training content to your organisation. That adaptation usually comes at a cost, and how far to take it comes down to budget. A common alternative is established content delivered by an experienced consultant who answers questions as they come and adapts the examples to the room. It also makes it easier to bring people from across the organisation into the same session.

Ask about customising content

Even if you do not plan to customise, ask whether the provider can. The answer tells you three things:

  1. How much thought sits behind their content. A provider who has built their own material will give you a clear point of view quickly. A vague answer often means generic content that has been repackaged.
  2. How well their content works across job roles. A provider whose material already works for finance, operations and client-facing staff will say so, and that tells you whether customising is worth the cost.
  3. Whether they can deliver a customisation. If you do need one, ask for examples from other organisations. Past examples tell you more about their ability than a promise does.

One session can serve every skill level

Providers often split training into beginner, intermediate and advanced streams, and it is worth asking how they handle skill levels. The distance from beginner to advanced is shorter than most people expect.

The aim is a provider who can demystify AI and build confidence in less experienced people while accelerating the ones who are further along. Good training often achieves this in the same session with the same content. The consultant's personal experience, backed by content kept current with each Copilot release, does more for a mixed room than extra streams do.

What the curriculum covers

Why your organisation chose Copilot

People learn more readily when they understand why a tool was chosen. A good session opens by connecting Copilot to the messages you have already shared on governance and security.

This does two things. Many people arrive worried about what AI means for their role, and knowing why the organisation chose Copilot helps them see it as support. Copilot also works inside your organisation's Microsoft 365 security and compliance controls, and understanding that is what gives people the confidence to use it with confidential information. From there, a walk through the basics of Copilot Chat is usually the best place to start.

Patterns that work across applications

It can be tempting to ask a provider to cover every Microsoft application with a Copilot icon. Covering every app takes more time than most organisations can spare.

A more useful request is for patterns that apply across applications. A pattern learned once in Word carries straight into Excel and Outlook. Ask the provider how adaptable their training is to this approach.

From prompt engineering to context engineering

Prompt engineering gets a lot of attention. People new to AI often find it onerous, even confronting, and much of the industry now favours context engineering.

Context engineering means building reusable artefacts, such as reference documents, templates and agents, that hold the information Copilot needs. Once the detail sits in those artefacts, a short brief does the work of a lengthy prompt. A useful question is whether participants build a reusable artefact of their own during the session.

Going further with agents

Microsoft includes several advanced agents with Copilot, notably Researcher and Analyst. Both work across many files and sources and return a structured report or analysis. A curriculum that introduces them moves people from asking questions to delegating substantial pieces of work.

Feature tours tend to leave people unsure which tool to pick, so the more useful teaching is when to use what. When is the Analyst agent the right choice over Excel? When does a task call for Researcher, and when is Copilot Chat with deeper reasoning enough?

Which tool, when
The work Reach for
A quick question, a first draft, a summary of an email thread or meeting Copilot Chat
A problem that benefits from more reasoning before an answer Copilot Chat with deeper reasoning
Writing or reworking a document Copilot in Word
Building or restructuring a spreadsheet Copilot in Excel
A research report drawing on your files, email, meetings and the web Researcher agent
Analysing raw data to find trends, forecasts or anomalies Analyst agent
A long, multi-step piece of work across applications Copilot Cowork

Most organisations also want to learn how to build their own AI agents. It is worth asking what the provider covers here and what is involved in getting from a first agent to one your team relies on.

Copilot Cowork

Cowork takes on long, multi-step pieces of work across your files and applications. It is built on Anthropic's Claude and comes with an additional usage cost, so a provider's view is worth having before you roll it out.

Three things are worth asking:

  • Their experience with it. Have they done much with Cowork, or is it still on their roadmap?
  • Their licensing view. Who in your organisation should have a Cowork licence, and who is well served without one?
  • Their Cowork content. Do they have dedicated material to help people get the most out of it? This often works best as a separate session.

Sequence the rollout

The order in which groups are trained affects how quickly adoption spreads. The three stages below are an example you might build from, based on a pattern we often see work well. Adjust them to suit your organisation.

An example rollout sequence to build from

Stage 1: Trial

Who attends: People and culture, plus a small group of IT stakeholders.

What it achieves: Confirms the content suits your organisation.

Stage 2: Senior executives

Who attends: Senior executives, trained together as one cross-functional class.

What it achieves: Creates change agents who carry the message back to their teams.

Stage 3: Team by team

Who attends: Groups of similar roles or mixed roles, as the provider recommends.

What it achieves: Builds habit across the organisation.

Start with a trial group. People and culture, plus a small group of IT stakeholders, attend first. They can confirm the content suits your organisation and fits your governance and security position before it reaches anyone else.

Then senior executives. Executives who have been through the training become change agents, and they carry the importance of it back to their teams. Executives also tend to talk openly about business scenarios and plans. Learning Copilot as a cross-functional group has value for them in its own right.

Then team by team. Depending on how the provider structures their content, this might mean groups of similar roles, or mixed groups that bring different roles together. The provider's recommendation is a useful starting point, weighed against what you know works for your people.

How the sessions run

Where your people are. Consider how your people are distributed and whether some of the training needs to run remotely. Each format calls for different handling of the exercises and the questions, so it is worth asking how the provider runs face-to-face, remote and hybrid sessions differently.

Recordings. A recording lets people revisit the session and lets anyone who missed it catch up. Ask whether the provider is happy to record and share it.

Time. Taking a team out for a full day carries a significant opportunity cost, and some providers can take people to an experienced level in half a day. Well-developed material covers more ground in less time, so how far a half day goes depends on how refined the provider's content is.

Copying and pasting prompts. Typing long prompts eats session time. Exercises where participants paste prompts keep the pace up and put the focus on what Copilot does with them. A provider can show you how their exercises work before you book.

Talking to the computer. Speaking is faster than typing for most people, and that makes voice a practical way to brief Copilot. Ask whether the provider includes voice in their training, and how they run it in a room full of people so participants get comfortable speaking to their computers.

How current is the content?

Copilot changes month to month. A useful question is what the provider has changed in their content over the last month or two.

A provider who can explain the recent changes quickly is confident with the product, and that is a good indicator of how they will handle the unscripted questions your team brings.

Adoption after the training

Training gets people started, and a dip in use in the weeks afterwards is normal. Long-term adoption depends on what happens next.

The post-training dip
Copilot uses per person, per day, over the weeks after training Use rises sharply at training, then dips in the following weeks. From the dip, people who receive ongoing support through practical sessions and ad hoc help climb to the habit level of about one use every ten minutes. People who receive training alone settle back to the daily active level of about one use a day. Uses per person, per day Habit: about every ten minutes Daily active: once a day Training The dip Weeks Ongoing support: practical sessions and ad hoc help Training plus ongoing support Training alone

Illustrative only, with no fixed scale. Ongoing support carries people through the dip to habit, while training alone settles back towards daily active use.

Adoption reports from past customers show what a provider tracks and how they present it, and are worth asking to see. The next question is how they help people keep using Copilot once the session ends. Practical follow-up sessions and ad hoc support both help carry people through the dip.

Some use cases will outgrow what your team can build alone. It is worth knowing early whether your training provider works alongside teams through their AI journey and can also build when that happens, or whether that work will go to someone else.

Turn the questions into a brief

A written brief gives every provider the same starting point, so their proposals can be compared line by line. Agreeing these decisions internally first sets your Copilot training scope, and the questions that follow test how each provider would deliver it.

Scope decisions for your brief
Scope decision What to settle
Outcome The habit you are aiming for and how you will measure it, beyond daily active users
Audience and sequence Who is trained, in what order, and whether groups mix roles
Format Face-to-face, remote or hybrid, and whether sessions are recorded
Duration Half day or full day, weighed against the time away from work
Content Standard content, customised content, or standard content adapted in the room
Curriculum Copilot Chat, patterns across applications, context engineering, agents, building your own agents and Copilot Cowork
Adoption support Adoption reporting, follow-up sessions and ad hoc support after the training

Questions to ask a Copilot training provider

The trainer

  • Who will deliver the training, and how do they use and build with AI in their own work?
  • Can they answer participants' questions on the spot and relate the answers to each role?

The content

  • Can you customise the content for us? What does that involve, what does it cost, and where have you done it before?
  • How well does your existing content work across different job roles?
  • How do you handle different skill levels within the same session?
  • What have you changed in your content in the last month or two?

The curriculum

  • How do you connect Copilot to our existing governance and security messaging?
  • Do you teach patterns that work across applications, and how adaptable is the training?
  • How do you approach context engineering and reusable artefacts?
  • Do you cover Researcher, Analyst and other agents, including when to use each one?
  • What is involved in teaching our people to build their own agents?
  • What have you done with Copilot Cowork, who do you think should be licensed for it, and do you have dedicated Cowork content?

The rollout

  • How would you sequence training across our roles, and who would you start with?
  • Do you recommend groups of similar roles or mixed groups, and why?

The session

  • How do you run face-to-face, remote and hybrid sessions differently?
  • Are you happy to record the session and share the recording with us?
  • How long is the training, and can you get people to an experienced level in half a day?
  • Can you show us how the exercises work? Do participants copy and paste prompts?
  • Do you include voice, and how do you run it in a room?

After the training

  • Can you show us adoption reports you have produced for other customers?
  • How do you support adoption after the session, through practical sessions, ad hoc support, or both?
  • If a use case outgrows our team, can you build it, or who would?

Frequently asked questions

What should I look for in a Copilot training provider?

Look at who delivers the session, how current the content is and what happens after it. A practising AI consultant can answer participants' questions on the spot and relate them to each role. Content refreshed in the last month or two keeps pace with Microsoft 365 Copilot. A provider that offers adoption reporting, follow-up sessions and ad hoc support helps people keep using Copilot once the training ends.

How long should Microsoft 365 Copilot training take?

Many organisations find half a day is enough to take people from their starting point to experienced users, provided the content is well developed. A full day carries a significant opportunity cost across a team. Ask each provider what their session covers in the time, and whether exercises use copy-and-paste prompts so participants spend the session working with Copilot.

Should Copilot training be customised for our organisation?

Customising Copilot training content usually adds cost, and it is not always needed. Many organisations choose established content delivered by an experienced consultant who adapts examples to the room. Asking a provider how they would customise still tells you how much thought sits behind their content, how well it works across job roles, and whether they have delivered customisations for other organisations.

How do you measure whether Copilot training has worked?

Daily active users only shows that someone opened Microsoft 365 Copilot once that day. A more useful measure is habit: how often people reach for Copilot during their work. In the deployments we have seen, an information worker with the habit uses Copilot around once every ten minutes. Expect a dip in the weeks after training, and plan ongoing support to carry people through it.

Who should attend Copilot training first?

A pattern that works well starts with a trial group from people and culture plus a few IT stakeholders, who confirm the content suits the organisation. Senior executives go next, becoming change agents for their teams and benefiting from a cross-functional session. Training then rolls out team by team, in similar-role or mixed-role groups depending on the provider's recommendation.

Choosing a Copilot training provider?

Send us your Copilot training brief, or the questions above, and we will return a proposed scope, format and session plan for your Microsoft 365 Copilot training.

Send your training brief